What is the difference between a parent kills his/her baby because he/she cannot feed the baby, and ...?

a parent who chooses to have abortion?What is the difference between a parent kills his/her baby because he/she cannot feed the baby, and ...?
What is so disgusting is that one is murder and the other is legally murder. They are both the same to me. The day that baby is made it is a baby no matter what you call it. People need to learn more about adoption instead of abortion or not being able to afford there child. They didn't ask to be brought into this world, the men and women who spread their legs did.What is the difference between a parent kills his/her baby because he/she cannot feed the baby, and ...?
If you are pro-life you don't see a difference between the babies and think both are murder, and that adoption should be considered.





If you are pro-choice you don't see an unborn baby as having the same rights as a baby that has been born, and would only think killing the baby that is already born is murder.





The answers you get will depend on the persons personal point fo view.
in my opinion both are wrong
one is legal and one isn't

















also... in one case the baby is born, has a life and started to live its life and then it's murdered.


in the other case the baby isn't born yet, it's still a fetus and dosn't have any idea of life yet and hasn't lived yet and isn't given the chance to suffer.
What are you talking about? Letting a baby starve has a multitude of LEGAL ramifications.





Abortion is in the eye of the beholder, my eyes say it's wrong.
For me, both process takes away the life of a baby, but Killing the baby because the parent cannot feed him/her is the worst. By abortion, it does kill the baby, but it is not as painful as killing a mature child. Either way, in my opinion, they are both inhumane
One is abuse and neglect. The other is a legal procedure.
Omg this question is depressing!
well one is illegal and the other one isnt but it still murder.
if you cannot feed your baby give it up for adoption if you don't it's neglect and murder. the other is just murder
If a parent kills a baby then it is murder. The baby has feelings, nerves and a heart beat. If the parent cannot feed the baby, then give the baby to someone who can. If a parent chooses to abort... Though many may argue a fetus is still a baby the fetus hasn't quite fully formed (i.e. no bond/feelings) yet..
Technically? One is legal and one isnt. Morally, really nothing in my opinion. Someone could prevent abortion by not having sex, or if it is a case of rape by getting the morning after pill. Someone could prevent the death of a child by starvation or any other form after it is born by putting the child up for adoption.
in a way it is the same because both actions are murder.


but an abortion is more humane than killing something that has already been born. there is an expression ';nipping it in the bud'; i think it fits well here. i know it sounds weird to call murder humane, which it isnt but its ';more'; humane than the alternitive. for example its definatly more humane to have an abortion then it is to have the baby and let it starve to death because there simply is no food for it. which happens alot believe it or not in places of extreme poverty where they do not have the ability to have an abortion for whatever reason. while letting the baby starve isnt directly killing it, you still would be killing it because your the mother and your supposed to make sure your baby, at the very least, has food.


by the way adoption may be an option here in america(if prolife laws are to be passed then we better improve our foster care system and our social services systems because they dont work very well right now) but in many places there is no one else to give the baby to, and the cause of the pregnancy could have been rape.